Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
Med (N Y) ; 1(1): 128-138.e3, 2020 12 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-988784

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The severity and outcome of COVID-19 cases has been associated with the percentage of circulating lymphocytes (LYM%), levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), lactic acid (LA), and viral load (ORF1ab Ct). However, the predictive power of each of these indicators in disease classification and prognosis remains largely unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively collected information on the above parameters in 142 patients with COVID-19, stratifying them by survival or disease severity. FINDINGS: CRP, PCT, IL-6, LYM%, and ORF1ab Ct were significantly altered between survivors and non-survivors. LYM%, CRP, and IL-6 were the most sensitive and reliable factors in distinguishing between survivors and non-survivors. These indicators were significantly different between critically ill and severe/moderate patients. Only LYM% levels were significantly different between severe and moderate types. Among all the investigated indicators, LYM% was the most sensitive and reliable in discriminating between critically ill, severe, and moderate types and between survivors and non-survivors. CONCLUSIONS: CRP, PCT, IL-6, LYM%, and ORF1ab Ct, but not LA, could predict prognosis and guide classification of COVID-19 patients. LYM% was the most sensitive and reliable predictor for disease typing and prognosis. We recommend that LYM% be further investigated in the management of COVID-19. FUNDING: This study was supported in part by awards from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Foundation and Frontier Research Project of Chongqing, and the Chongqing Youth Top Talent Project.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adolescente , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Estado Terminal , Humanos , Interleucina-6 , Pró-Calcitonina , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(6)2020 05 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-590624

RESUMO

At present, PCR-based nucleic acid detection cannot meet the demands for coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) diagnosis. Two hundred fourteen confirmed COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized in the General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People's Liberation Army between 18 January and 26 February 2020 were recruited. Two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits based on recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleocapsid protein (rN) and spike protein (rS) were used for detecting IgM and IgG antibodies, and their diagnostic feasibility was evaluated. Among the 214 patients, 146 (68.2%) and 150 (70.1%) were successfully diagnosed with the rN-based IgM and IgG ELISAs, respectively; 165 (77.1%) and 159 (74.3%) were successfully diagnosed with the rS-based IgM and IgG ELISAs, respectively. The positive rates of the rN-based and rS-based ELISAs for antibody (IgM and/or IgG) detection were 80.4% and 82.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of the rS-based ELISA for IgM detection was significantly higher than that of the rN-based ELISA. We observed an increase in the positive rate for IgM and IgG with an increasing number of days post-disease onset (d.p.o.), but the positive rate of IgM dropped after 35 d.p.o. The positive rate of rN-based and rS-based IgM and IgG ELISAs was less than 60% during the early stage of the illness, 0 to 10 d.p.o., and that of IgM and IgG was obviously increased after 10 d.p.o. ELISA has a high sensitivity, especially for the detection of serum samples from patients after 10 d.p.o., so it could be an important supplementary method for COVID-19 diagnosis.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/imunologia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/imunologia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Signal Transduct Target Ther ; 5(1): 61, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-175087

RESUMO

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/s41392-020-0148-4.].

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA